This prompted a few comments and strong opinions in both the comments and on twitter.
My main intention with the post was originally to rally against creating properties with a private setter when they will only ever be set once and the code that does the setting is kept apart from the property.
All things being equal I'd rather maintain code that looks like my preferred code than the first example.
I do, however,appreciate that this is not optimal in all situations. I've just spent lots of time working with code that does trivial things in the command or are executed occassionally and so the overhead of creating a new command each time it's needed is not an issue.
For the avoidance of doubt, I'm perfectly fine with any of the following when used at an appropriate time.
public class MyViewModel : ViewModelBase { private RelayCommand myCommand; public RelayCommand MyCommand { get { if (myCommand == null) { myCommand = new RelayCommand(() => { // some functionality here }); } return myCommand; } } }or
public class MyViewModel : ViewModelBase { private RelayCommand myCommand; public RelayCommand SaveCommand { get { if (myCommand == null) { myCommand = new RelayCommand(this.Save); } return myCommand; } } private void Save() { // do something } }and I've used both in the past.
Anyway, moving on...
Or better yet
ReplyDeletepublic class MyViewModel : ViewModelBase
{
private RelayCommand myCommand;
public RelayCommand SaveCommand
{
get
{
return myCommand ?? (myCommand = new RelayCommand(this.Save));
}
}
private void Save()
{
// do something
}
}
@Jamie yep that works fine too.
ReplyDeleteAs a personal preference, I'm not a fan of using null coalescing to set backing fields but maybe that's me.
I think your public property should be an ICommand not a RelayCommand - ICommand is part of your interface, RelayCommand just happens to be how you implement that interface.
ReplyDelete